Beta Male On NYC Subway

I saw something disgusting and hilarious on the subway. I saw a decent guy with an ugly evil girlfriend.

I view the "1-10" rating system as percentile, rather than a normal distribution. The guy was 7-8. The woman was a clearcut 1.

BTW, by FSK standards, "above average weight" doesn't imply ugly. Personality type is a factor. Above average weight and intelligent is attractive. Above average weight and evil/parasite as ugly. This woman was overweight and evil.

The man had the "abused productive" personality type. He wasn't able to attract an "abused productive" woman, due to The Matrix. He had enough self-respect to avoid someone really evil. Therefore, his only choice was a low-skill evil woman.

The woman had him totally psychologically dominated. That aspect was hilarious. He had a look of despair on his face. He was wondering "Is this all life has to offer me, dating a woman who's a '1'? Why can't I do better?" He probably subconsciously noticed me laughing at him.

The woman wasn't wearing a wedding ring. Maybe there was still some hope for the guy.

I thought about saying to him "Dude, learn some Game." I'm no Game expert, but I understand some of the principles. Should I have said something? I chickened out and didn't. I considered it.

There's a philosophy of meeting women known as "Game" or "Fast Seduction" or "Neuro-Linguistic Programming" (NLP). I'll use "Game" for all of these.

"Game" is a combination of great advice and lousy advice. I'm able to notice the useful advice and ignore the wrong advice.

In Game jargon, betas have the "abused productive" personality type. Omega are "extreme abused productive", like me before I started seeing The Matrix. Alphas are parasites. Super-alphas are psychopaths.

I no longer fit on that scale.

I'm able to understand emotions almost as well as a psychopath. I'm not interested in exploiting that knowledge to do evil things.

The philosophy of Game says "The Matrix exists. I can be an exploited beta, or I can be an exploiter/alpha/psychopath. I'd rather be an exploiter than a victim." The correct answer is to be neither an exploiter nor a victim.

Therefore, Game focuses on emulating psychopath behaviors, rather than being a true leader. That's why Game is perceived as evil. If you try to act like a psychopath without actually being a psychopath, it's obviously sleazy and Blagojevich-like. (That was Blagojevich's crime. He tried to play the psychopath favor-trading game without being a full psychopath. He got explicit in his quid pro quo demands. A psychopath would have done his part in exchange for a vague unspecified future favor, knowing he could count on his fellow psychopaths to obey the psychopath code of ethics.)

Game says "I want to be the parasite/psychopath, rather than be the victim." A true leader would say "I want to make sure my partner also understands how The Matrix works."

Game is a mixture of good advice and bad advice. That makes it useful and dangerous. By mixing good advice with bad advice, the good advice tricks people into believing that the bad advice is also good.

Here's the aspects of Game I consider to be good advice.

1. You should pursue multiple women.

2. If a woman rejects you, move on to the next one.

The State media brainwashing campaign explicitly encourages "oneitis". Consider a the plot of a typical "romantic comedy".

Guy meets girl. Girl rejects him. Guy is persistent. Girl rejects him. Guy is persistent. Girl eventually accepts him.

This promotes "oneitis".

Compare this with what a sane person does.

Guy meets girl #1. Girl #1 rejects him. Guy meets girl #2. Girl #2 rejects him. ... Guy meets girl #n. Girl #n accepts him.

That would be a lousy movie plot. That's how a sane guy meets women. By promoting plot #1 instead of plot #2, the State media cartel promotes oneitis.

3. Don't accept abuse.

4. Be sure of what you want.

I noticed that I'm able to almost instantly evaluate people now. That's a big advantage. "Don't trust your gut reaction!" is a type of pro-State brainwashing. Most people are able to intrinsically sense evil people, but they suppress this skill due to the Matrix. In fact, psychopaths use their "detect evil" skill to recognize fellow psychopaths!

5. Monogamy isn't natural. (I'm not sure about this one. It's an interesting viewpoint.)

6. Divorce law is biased against men.

Suppose I enter a contract with you. You break the contract, but I still have to pay you. That's stupid. Only an idiot would make such a contract. That's the way "no-fault" divorce laws work.

You wife can have an affair, divorce you, and you have to give her your stuff and pay alimony. Your wife can have a child with another man, and you have to pay to support it. What a ripoff!

One of my now-ex coworkers got screwed by this. His wife divorced him, he's paying child support, and his daughter is living with him while his ex-wife dates other men. He was on the phone with his ex-wife every day. What a loser! No wonder she divorced him.

I asked him if he was sure that his daughter was really his. He insisted "Yes." I advised him to get a paternity test and he refused.

You can avoid unfair divorce law by choosing your wife carefully. However, unfair laws would make even an honest woman tempted to cheat!

7. If you've been dating someone for awhile, don't slip into "beta mode" (abused productive mode).

8. "Game" tactics are useful, even if you want to get married and be monogamous. If you aren't the leader in your marriage, you will probably be cheated by State divorce law.

Suppose you are beta and your wife is the leader. Your wife may eventually decide "I'm tired of being the leader. I'm dumping this loser and dating someone stronger." Or, she might have an affair and leave you to raise someone else's child.

9. There's a lot of pro-State brainwashing against men and traditional male values. State insiders promoted "feminism" and "women in the workplace" to further enslave people and to start taxing women's labor.

"Men vs. women" is the usual "divide and conquer the slaves" trick.

10. There is a disconnect between emotional mental state and logical mental state. ("the rationalization hamster") This is a symptom of the Matrix.

Here's an example of negative features of Game:

1. Give a woman randomized negative feedback ("negs"). Strong random feedback is preferred to wimpy feedback. The correct answer is "Negative feedback only when she does something bad."

2. If a woman wants to get married, it's OK to string her along.

3. If a woman is ambivalent about sex, you should be super-aggressive. I don't like this. This could lead to "date rape" accusations.

This comes from the fact that a woman may emotionally be attracted to you, but be brainwashed into resisting.

4. Some people confuse "Act like a leader." with "Act like a scumbag." However, those people probably misunderstand Game.

5. There's a list of tricks you can use that works.

It's better to fully unplug from The Matrix. There's no finite list that works. If you're working from a script, it'll be obviously fake.

It was both amusing and frustrating to see that loser guy on the subway. I avoided that fate. I wasn't able to attract another "abused productive" woman. I was too self-aware to be with someone evil. Thus, I was left out. Now, I'm learning how to relate to "abused productive" women without acting like a psychopath. I'm making progress, but not fully there.

That's why "decent guy with ugly girlfriend" or "hot girl with ugly boyfriend" is a common pattern. If you have the "abused productive" (attractive) personality type, then your natural pairing is a parasite/psychopath (ugly).

I was simultaneously amused and offended by that decent guy on the subway, dating a "1". I thought about saying something, but didn't. Hopefully, I'll avoid that fate.

Silk Road Was A Partial AgoristBay Implementation

This story was interesting. Silk Road is a website where people can buy and sell any drug. In the example cited in the story, someone bought LSD on Silk Road.

According to that article, Silk Road's operator explicitly calls himself an agorist.

Here's how Silk Road operated. You can only access the website via Tor. The only form of money accepted is Bitcoin. There was a seller feedback rating system. You would receive your drugs via mail.

After the article and mainstream media publicity, Silk Road shut itself down to new users. I wonder how many DEA agents are Silk Road users?

Here are the flaws in Silk Road's design:

1. Tor probably is not secure.
2. Bitcoin probably is not secure.
3. You can only trade Anonymously.
4. It is vulnerable to State infiltration.
5. There should be both a seller feedback system and a buyer feedback system.
6. Not every buyer and seller should be visible to each other. You should only see other trustworthy users.
7. Silk Road itself should be P2P organized, rather than having one central website.
   

Here's a more detailed explanation.

1. Tor probably is not secure.

I suspect that a large number of Tor exit nodes are run by the NSA/State.

Stories like this one are interesting. Someone runs a Tor exit node. Police raid that person's home, saying he was "downloading child pornography". The person shuts down his Tor exit exit node.

This implies that State thugs are running all the Tor exit nodes. Here's the scam:

1. See if anyone non-approved is operating a Tor exit node.
2. Download child pornography via their Tor exit node.
3. Accuse that person of a crime.
   

Notice how "child pornography" laws make it illegal for someone to operate a Tor exit node.

With Tor, the "exit nodes" are a vulnerability. If all exit nodes are run by the State, that makes it very easy for State thugs to monitor Tor.

State thugs have the resources to control most Tor nodes. The NSA may have put a backdoor encryption flaw in Tor. Tor is probably untrustworthy. I'm very suspicious. State thugs crack down on anyone running a Tor exit node from their PC.

Another downside of Tor is that Tor is *SLOW*!

I did briefly experiment with Tor. I concluded that it was slow and probably NSA-controlled.

2. Bitcoin is probably not secure.

I already mentioned that I don't like Bitcoin. I'll review the main flaws in Bitcoin.

1. Every client has a copy of the full monetary base.
2. Every client gets a copy of every transaction.
3. Very few people have a Bitcoin client on their PC. State thugs can see who's running Bitcoin, and add them to their "subversive persons" list.
   

Every client gets a copy of everything! That's like handing your records to the State! All State thugs have to do is run a Bitcoin client, and they get to see what every other Bitcoin user is doing!

Bitcoin seems like an intentionally-flawed design.

I don't like Bitcoin. I would accept bitcoins as payment, only if I could immediately trade them for FRNs or gold or silver.

It was amusing that people accused me of pro-State trolling, for criticizing Bitcoin. Instead of addressing my concerns, they dismissed and ridiculed me. Is Bitcoin secretly run by the State? That is a pretty standard pro-State troll debating tactic, to ridicule someone without addressing their criticism.

I own zero bitcoins. I have no incentive to promote Bitcoin. Suppose you own 1000 bitcoins. Then, you have an incentive to promote Bitcoin. If more people use Bitcoin, then your bitcoins become worth more.

BTW, a simple arbitrage argument says "value of a bitcoin" should be close to "cost of mining". Bitcoins can never be worth more than the cost of mining, because then more people would mine.

If bitcoins were worth less than the cost of mining, then people would stop mining. If I were unethical, I could configure the servers at work to mine bitcoins at no cost to me. In that case, I'd be mining bitcoins at no cost to myself.

However, it is possible for bitcoins to be worth less than the mining cost. As an extreme example, if everyone stopped using bitcoin, then the value would go to zero, even though it would still cost electricity to mine more.

Bitcoins can never be worth more than the cost of mining. They could be worth much less.

3. You can only trade Anonymously.

Silk Road is only useful for Anonymous transactions, especially selling drugs. Silk Road does not facilitate in-person transactions.

You can't do the following on Silk Road:

1. find a good unlicensed plumber/electrician/doctor
2. find a good unlicensed restaurant
3. buy raw milk
   
4. trade State paper money for gold (but you probably could use bitcoins)
5. find an off-the-books job
   

Silk Road is focused on destructive transactions, mainly drugs, rather than constructive transactions.

I disagree with "Certain drugs should be illegal." However, most drugs are harmful rather than beneficial.

4. Silk Road is vulnerable to State infiltration.

There almost definitely are some DEA agents and undercover police on Silk Road. It'd be pretty easy to buy some LSD and then trace the package back to the source. Also, DEA agents may pose as sellers. Due to State law, if you're in possession of a certain quantity of a drug, you're treated as equivalent a seller.

Once the DEA identifies a high-reputation user, they can say "give us your account as part of a plea bargain". Once a high-trust account is compromised, Silk Road will completely unravel.

5. There should be both a buyer and seller rating system. The buyer needs to trust the seller, to not cheat him. The seller needs to know that the buyer isn't an undercover policeman.

Silk Road has insufficient protection against infiltration by the State.

For example, a better system is "You only get to join Silk Road if an existing user refers you." Even better, the person who refers you pledges to make a payment, if you turn out to be an undercover cop or otherwise break the trading network rules.

6. Not every buyer and seller should be visible to each other. You should only see trustworthy people.

It's much safer if you only see "trusted partners" rather than everyone. There should be a user referral system, where one person says "I promise this person isn't an undercover cop."

Of course, a "user referral system" only works once you have a certain number of users. If you're starting from zero customers, you need to advertise just to get started!

7. Silk Road still is centralized. It's only one server hidden behind Tor. That's a vulnerability.

Another precaution is to decentralize it in P2P fashion, rather than keep everything on one server. You don't get to see all transactions and sale offers, only those of people who trust you.

Also, if Silk Road were decentralized P2P, then they could use their own encryption system rather than Tor. They could use their own internal accounting system rather than Bitcoin. They would allow pay-in and pay-out via any system. For example, you could send someone some bitcoins or mail someone an ounce of gold.

Silk Road seems like a partial implementation of AgoristBay. It's a nice try. It still has some flaws.

Silk Road has been outed by the mainstream media. Undercover State police have probably infiltrated it. If the site operator is smart, the most trustworthy users should move somewhere else and start over. I'd avoid Tor and Bitcoin. I don't trust them.

"AgoristBay" should use its own encryption and accounting system, and not rely on Tor or Bitcoin.

Silk Road was an interesting partial implementation of "AgoristBay". It was outed by the mainstream media, which makes it very risky now. Silk Road has definitely drawn the attention of the State. The most trustworthy Silk Road users should develop a better system and start over.

"Best of FSK" - May 2011

In May 2011, my most popular posts by Absolute Unique Pageviews were:

1. Did the USA Declare Bankruptcy? (344)
2. BMI/ASCAP/SESAC Legal Extortion Scam (299)
3. The Federal Reserve Caused the Great Depression (284)
4. The Hunt Brothers' Silver Corner (258)
5. Who's the Richest Man in the World? (189)
6. Ruby on Rails Sucks! (186)
7. The Pat Tillman Conspiracy Theory (171)
8. The Compound Interest Paradox (158)
9. Kenneth Moreno And Franklin Mata (129)
10. David Sokol, Warren Buffett, And Insider Trading (125)
11. The Sovereign Government Movement (122)
12. The Bitcoin Conspiracy Theory (113)
13. The Gold and Silver Taxation Scam (105)
14. Calculating Vega and other Greeks in Black-Scholes (101)
15. Premium Text Messaging Fraud - 91097 and 654654 (101)
16. The Gold Lease Rate is Negative! (96)
17. Satanic Death Hospitals (86)
18. Is It Worth Hoarding Nickels? (82)
19. Real GDP is Decreasing, 1990-2008 (76)
20. The Fluoride Conspiracy Theory (72)
21. The Communist Manifesto's Successful Implementation in the USA (66)
22. Goldman Sachs and Facebook (66)
23. Agorist Philosophy Overview (63)
24. Real GDP Is Crashing, 2000-2009 (63)
25. The Silence And Psychopaths (62)
26. Kitchen Nightmares And Psychopaths (59)
27. Are College Athletes Exploited? (57)
28. American Idol And Auto-Tune (57)
29. New DVR - Magnavox 515h (52)
30. When Will The Federal Reserve Raise Interest Rates? (51)
31. Real GDP is Decreasing, 1990-2007 (50)
32. When Was Osama Bin Laden Killed? (47)

If you only count posts published in May 2011, the most popular were:

1. Kenneth Moreno And Franklin Mata (129)
2. David Sokol, Warren Buffett, And Insider Trading (125)
3. The Sovereign Government Movement (122)
4. The Silence And Psychopaths (62)
5. Kitchen Nightmares And Psychopaths (59)
6. New DVR - Magnavox 515h (52)
7. When Was Osama Bin Laden Killed? (47)
8. Ireland Steals Private Pensions (45)
9. The Banksters Stole $300M From LinkedIn Pre-IPO Shareholders (37)
10. "Tax The Rich" Fallacy (32)
11. What Is The Real Unemployment Rate? (32)
12. Who Cares About Obama's Birth Certificate? (31)
13. Iraq Order 81 (30)
14. President Obama Steals $90k From A Family Who Sold Rabbits (30)
15. Utah Didn't Make Gold And Silver Legal Tender (28)

Wiener's Wiener

This story was funny. Someone posted a picture of a man's erect wiener to Congressman Wiener's Twitter account.

That link had an interesting twist. Edward's indictment is perfectly timed to push the Wiener story out of the headlines. I wonder if State propagandists keep a queue of "hot" stories, that they can use to bury any unfortunate news?

Jon Stewart said "Anthony Wiener is a personal friend of mine." He almost had me believing Wiener's explanation "Someone hacked my Twitter account!"

This is one problem with the mainstream media. Journalists and politicians are buddies with each other. Politicians and journalists are drawn from the same group of insiders. They're all statists who think alike.

It's pretty obvious what happened. Wiener meant to send it as a private message, but accidentally sent it to his full feed. Wiener is acting ambivalent. He's concerned that someone else with a Wiener picture will come forward, exposing him as a liar.

Does that ever work? Has any man ever bagged a woman by sending him a picture of his Wiener? Do you know any woman who says "After seeing that picture of your Wiener, I immediately fell in love!" "Today, on Jerry Springer, men who met their wives by texting a photo of their Wiener!"

Some journalists say "If your Twitter account really was hacked, then why don't you complain to the FBI?" Lying to the FBI is a crime. Lying to CNN is a not crime.

This is an example of "Right conclusion, wrong reasons." "Wiener published a naughty picture on Twitter. Therefore, he is evil." Wiener is a statist and a politician. Wiener uses the threat of violence to steal and tell everyone else what to do. That's why he's evil.

Even if Wiener is disgraced, some other statist will replace him. He is evil, not because of the photo, but because he helps promote State violence.

---

According to Google Analytics, this post is very popular in Google search. This is an unexpected SEO hit.

My political philosophy is "market anarchism" or "agorism", which is very different from the mainstream viewpoint. It's the only political philosophy I've seen that makes sense.

The mainstream debate between Republicans and Democrats is a fake debate. They're colluding to rob the American people. For example, TARP and the bank bailouts were a "bipartisan" effort, even though most people were opposed to that ripoff. Indirect bailouts via the Federal Reserve were much bigger than TARP.

My main points are:

1. The Federal Reserve is evil. Via inflation, the banksters and politicians steal. The Federal Reserve can lend as much money as they want to whoever they want at 0% interest without any public disclosure. The Compound Interest Paradox is a more subtle argument against the Federal Reserve and fiat debt-based money. (Some people strongly disagree with me regarding the Compound Interest Paradox. They are wrong.)
2. The income tax is evil. You have to get permission from the government and IRS whenever you work. That means you aren't fully free. You're a partial slave. With income taxation rates close to 50%, plus indirect taxes, you are very much the property of the government and Congress.
   
3. All taxation is theft, no matter how it's collected and no matter what it's used for. Why should someone be allowed to use the threat of violence, to steal from you via taxes?
4. Currently, problems created by government are falsely blamed on the free market. For example, the "free market banking system" didn't fail in the housing bubble/bust. There is not a free market in banking. The Federal Reserve is one big price-fixing cartel. Insiders get to borrow at artificially cheap rates, giving them an incentive to gamble. For another example, the "free market healthcare system" didn't fail. Via government licensing requirements, the supply of doctors is artificially restricted, driving up prices.
5. All services currently performed by government could be done better in a really free market, by competing vendors. That includes police and courts and roads. It's a huge change in perspective, compared to what you were brainwashed to believe.

Check out the "Best of FSK" list in the left sidebar for more details. More and more people are getting interested in "market anarchism" or "agorism" or "anarcho-capitalism".

Ron Paul Talking Points

On Tuesday, Ron Paul was on CNBC.

Here's another link with the same video. (Dwhelper works with YouTube but not with mainstream media video players. I have a somewhat slow Internet connection. It's easier for me to download a video rather than watch while streaming. Also, mainstream media players don't support fast-forward and rewind. It loses the buffer and you have to re-download.)

Ron Paul wins the "least evil Congressman" award. Still, I found that video very disturbing. Do you see why? Watch the video carefully.

SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE
SPOILER SPACE

Ron Paul goes from one talking point to the next. That's an evil conversation style. It's Liberarian talking points, but it's still a bunch of talking points.

Listen carefully! Ron Paul is going from one talking point to another, rather than speaking in English.

That is partially forced by the mainstream media interview style. Ron Paul only has a few minutes, which isn't enough time to explain his non-mainstream viewpoint.

I find Rand Paul disturbing. When he criticizes State evil, I feel that he's reading from a teleprompter rather than really meaning it. Rand Paul seems to have some parasitic tendencies.

This quote was really disturbing. Rand Paul seems to say that people who attend anti-government protests that advocate violence should be treated as criminals. State thugs don't seem to make much distinction between nonviolent resistance and violent resistance. Besides, there isn't much difference between "The government's authority isn't legitimate!" and "If you try to kidnap me, I'm going to defend myself!"

It's hard to evaluate someone's personality type on TV. You can't tell unless you meet them in person and it's somewhat interactive.

Ron Paul wins the "least evil Congressman" award. He's pushing the limits of the "debate ceiling" and "Overton Window". Ron Paul represents the most Libertarian/minarchist viewpoint you can have, and still get elected.

However, you can be the least evil Congressman and still be pretty evil.

Ron Paul illustrates the fallacy of "working within the system". He's accomplished practically nothing, regarding shrinking government and eliminating the Federal Reserve. He still gets earmarks for his district in spending bills. However, Ron Paul has helped raise awareness for the evils of the Federal Reserve and IRS.

Do Ron Paul and Rand Paul have the "abused productive" personality type? Are they parasites who found a lucrative niche? They win the "least evil Congressmen" award. They may have evil tendencies. I can't be sure, because I haven't met them in person. You can't tell if someone is evil by seeing them on TV.

Dancing At The Jefferson Memorial

This story was widely cited. Some activists were dancing at the Jefferson Memorial, knowing that the police would object. They were arrested.

This is a point I've made several times.

IT ISN'T A COMPETITION TO SEE WHO CAN GET ARRESTED FOR THE STUPIDEST REASON!!

Yes, it is offensive that the police will kidnap and torture you over minor issues. However, that doesn't mean I should place myself in a situation where police will kidnap me. I might risk kidnapping, but only if there's a clear profit.

If the baliff demands that you take off your hat, you should do it. It is offensive that police say "Obey or we'll kindap or kill you!" You shouldn't intentionally seek a confrontation with a bully.

It is a gesture of being a slave, that you submit to every tiny demand. Dealing with government thugs is like dealing with a crazy person with a gun. You don't escalate small disputes when dealing with a lunatic, especially when the lunatics outnumber you.

Adam Kokesh did have a reason to organize the protest. He's promoting his show on "Russia Today". Ironically, Russia's government is sponsoring anti-government protests in the USA!

I can logically explain why the State is evil, without getting arrested for something stupid. "The police arrested me for something trivial!" is an *EMOTIONAL* argument against the State, and not a logical argument. It's anti-State activism that's attractive to people with the parasitic personality type.

If you're going to risk arrest/kidnapping/torture, do it in a situation that's low-risk and high-reward, rather than over something trivial. I'd respect someone who was kidnapped for operating an agorist business, much more than someone kidnapped for something stupid.

A lot of people are focused on "Get arrested for a stupid reason!", rather than more serious activism. That type of foolishness seems attractive to people with the parasitic personality type. I can logically explain why the State is evil, without resorting to silly publicity stunts.

In Loco Parentis - The Crazy Parent

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Iraq Order 81":

This is one of those "gems" that are invaluable to know if one wants to figure out why did we go to Iraq, to bring them freedom or to shackle them to slavery.

....

also, might be of interest to you bud:

According to the Department of Human Services, there are claims of neglect against Godboldo for not giving her daughter prescribed medications. Godboldo has said the anti-psychotic medications prescribed for her daughter would do more harm than good and refuses to administer them.

Maryann Godboldo

I heard about that and was planning a post on that. I thought I had a draft. It was about *ANOTHER* mother jailed for failing to medicate her children.

This comes back to the legal principle of "In Loco Parentis". It's a Spanish phrase that means "The Crazy Parent". The State is like your crazy mother-in-law, telling you how to raise your children.

---

This story is offensive. A mother, Kristen Labrie, refused to drug her kid, as ordered by a doctor. The doctor complained to the State. She lost custody of her kid. The kid was forcibly drugged, and later died. The mother was convicted of murder, for failing to forcibly drug her child as ordered by the doctor and State.

Did the kid die because the mother refused to drug him? Did the kid die because he was taken from his mother and forcibly drugged?

Suppose the mother obeyed the doctor's orders and the kid died anyway. Would the doctor have been charged with murder?

This is a important issue. A patient has the right to refuse treatment. For a child, this decision is made by the parent. The State owns your child. Therefore, the mother is guilty of destroying State property.

My current drug, Seroquel, seems to be working well. However, I was hospitalized 7 times and given the wrong drug. Several psychiatrists gave me the wrong drug. I only found a psychiatrist who tried Seroquel because I refused treatment from incompetent doctors.

If I had blindly obeyed my doctor's orders, I would still be taking Risperdal and lithium. That had horrible side-effects. I was unable to do anything. In retrospect, I was correct to refuse treatment, because I was given the wrong drug. (I thought about a malpractice lawsuit. I decided that isn't practical. Besides, the statute of limitations has expired on my first few hospitalizations.)

This murder conviction is very offensive. A patient has the right to refuse medical treatment. A parent has the right to refuse on behalf of her child. If you refuse to drug your child, as ordered by a doctor, then you're guilty of murder?

This conviction is senseless. Does the prosecutor really believe the mother intentionally murdered her child? What is accomplished by jailing her? Instead of blaming a corrupt medical cartel, the mother is blamed.

"Treat illness with symptom-suppressing drugs" is one of the biggest medical scams ever. To preserve the medical cartel, the mother was blamed. This is a horrible precedent. State thugs are saying "If you disagree with your child's doctor, then we will kidnap your child and charge you with a crime." This corrupt trial is an excellent example of State evil.

---

That story was about chemotherapy. Psychiatric drugs are just as bad or worse.

This story is an interesting counterexample. A child was not responding well to chemotherapy. His father, Mike Hyde, gave him medical marijuana and stopped the chemotherapy. The child got better.

Did the child get better because of marijuana? Did the child get better because he stopped chemotherapy?

Chemotherapy is literally poison. The idea is that cancer cells are reproducing rapidly. They will absorb more poison than healthy cells.

It's pretty pathetic that "take lots of poison" is the best cancer treatment available by State-licensed medicine. It's the usual paradigm of promoting drugs over other forms of medicine.

---

Here's a link summarizing Maryanne Godboldo's story.

Maryanne Godboldo was homeschooling her handicapped daughter. She decided to send her child to State public school. As condition of admission, her daughter was forced to get vaccinations.

Her child had negative side-effects of the vaccines. (This gets back to "Do vaccines cause autism?" and "Are vaccines really safe and effective?")

Maryanne Godboldo took her child to a State clinic (another mistake). The child was prescribed Risperdal. That seems bizarre, to prescribe Risperdal for vaccine side-effects? Do vaccines cause mental illness? Is there something in vaccines that helps reinforce pro-State brainwashing?

The child had even worse negative side-effects due to the Risperdal. The mother stopped poisoning her child. The doctors at the State clinic objected. They complained to the State police.

Police came to Maryanne Godboldo to kidnap her child and poison her. Maryanne Godboldo had a gun and resisted the police. Her child was kidnapped and now she was charged with a crime.

My personal experience with Risperdal was *EXTREMELY NEGATIVE*. Surprisingly, Seroquel seems to be working well.

A psychiatrist typically examines you for a couple of minutes a month. How can the psychiatrist tell in a few minutes, if the drug is working or not? How can the psychiatrist overrule the parent, who saw negative side-effects of the drug every day?

When I was taking Risperdal, I felt like doing nothing and sleeping all day. I couldn't concentrate. I expect that other people would have a similar negative side-effect. Psychiatrists justify their lies by saying "Every drug has a different effect on everyone." I disagree. If I had a serious negative side-effect on a drug, I question whether it's appropriate for others.

Most people won't push back, when their doctor prescribes a harmful drug. They'll be emotionally intimidated by their doctor, saying that the drug is working when it really isn't.

I strongly suspect that Risperdal is inappropriately used 99%+ of the time. Unfortunately, I can't trust State scientists to perform an honest experiment. I'd like to see research comparing psychiatric drugs and placebos over a period of years/decades. Most State medical research is for 6-12 weeks, an insufficient time period.

Do you have the right to refuse medical treatment for yourself? My psychiatrists reacted with extreme hostility, when I refused Risperdal, Geodon, Lithium, and Abilify.

Do you have the right to refuse medical treatment for your child? In a really free market, the parent gets to make decisions for his child until the child is an adult.

Many psychiatric drugs are worse than placebo. Chemotherapy may be worse than doing nothing.

Are children sick with a "mental illness"? Or, are they sick as a side effects of the drugs they are taking?

Are cancer patients sick because they have cancer? Are they sick because of the chemotherapy?

You should have the right to make medical decisions for your child. You should have the right to overrule the doctor and refuse treatment. This is especially true for treatments that have harmful side-effects, like psychiatric drugs and chemotherapy.

It is offensive that Maryanne Godboldo is charged with a crime, for protecting her child. The police were going to kidnap her daughter and poison her. The mother claimed that her daughter had negative side-effects on Risperdal. Isn't that a good enough reason?

The State claims that your children are State property. Via the legal principle of "In Loco Parentis" or "The Crazy Parent", the State tells you how to raise your children. If you disobey, State police will use violence to kidnap your children. If you attempt to defend yourself, you will be killed or charged with a crime.

If I had children and taught them about market anarchism, State police may kidnap and brainwash my child. The police might claim that I'm being a bad parent, for not teaching them State lies.