Some people claim that Osama bin Laden was actually killed 9 years ago. Allegedly, Benazir Bhutto claimed that Osama bin Laden was killed in late 2001. She was silenced via assassination.
Some bloggers claim that the "Osama bin Laden" videos that were "certified legitimate" by the US government were obvious fakes.
Did US troops kill Osama bin Laden? Did they kill a bearded arabic guy? You can't be sure.
Even "releasing the photos" would prove nothing. Someone would claim they were photoshopped.
Osama bin Laden had failing kidneys. I didn't see any report claiming that his "compound" had a kidney dialysis machine.
Suppose Osama bin Laden really did die 9 years ago, but they exactly weren't sure when or where. Then, you can stage a raid claiming to kill him.
Disturbingly, the US government kept changing the "official story". First they said he used a woman as a shield, and later he didn't. First, they said he was armed and shot at US troops. Later, they said he was unarmed. It's embarrassing that they kept changing the "official story".
By rapidly disposing of the body/evidence, it's now impossible to prove if they actually killed him.
It was obviously a kill mission, and not a "capture him alive" mission. What happened to due process? Doesn't he get a trial? Can the President declare anyone a terrorist, and summarily execute them?
It would have been embarrassing to have a trial, where the defendant was claiming "You got the wrong guy!"
"No-knock warrants" are sometimes death warrants for the victim. Sometimes, the judge explicitly instructs the police to shoot first and ask questions later, as Randy Weaver's wife discovered.
Police can summarily execute anyone with a trial. All they have to do is say "He was resisting! I thought he was reaching for a gun!", and now it's legal murder.
Most police are not homicidal maniacs. However, they know the State legal system will bend over backwards to rule in their favor. Therefore, the incentive is to use deadly force, even when it isn't necessary.
There's another disturbing aspect of the "official story". Isn't Pakistan a puppet government and ally? Why didn't they catch him?
Also, if he really was Osama bin Laden, wouldn't they want to interrogate him?
This "Osama bin Laden" murder story has many suspicious elements. The "official story" changed several times. The body and evidence were rapidly destroyed. The real bin Laden may have actually died 9 years ago. The US troops went on an assassination mission, rather than capturing him and giving him a fair trial.
Monday, May 9, 2011
When Was Osama Bin Laden Killed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
We have to lose our civil rights because Osama is alive, on the loose. Now that he is certified dead we have to lose our civil rights because he is dead.
Train stations.
I thought it was very strange that "authorities" got rid of evidence of 9/11 as fast as they did, because every other aircraft-involved catastrophe gets a "forever-storage" treatment.
It looked as though the "authorities" wanted to get rid of evidence.
Next, they alleged that OBL has something to do with 9/11. Ok, I thought that after he is captured, he is going to be afforded at least a show trial. Not so. He (if it was OBL) got disposed off as fast as possible, so that there is no one to protect him from these accusations.
"Authorities" claim there is no conspiracy in 9/11, and yet, they make sure that there is no loose end left, that could possibly lead us to understanding what had happened to us on 9/11.
Considering the above, am I being unreasonable to suspect that the government has something to hide with regards to 9/11?
my inside sources are telling me they had to kill him. Because he once worked for the C.I.A. back in the days of the russian invasion.
He knew to many dirty secrets about our governments operation.
No one can give me any reason why his value as an asset under interagation wasnt more then him being dead.
He was killed because he knew to much. And what he knew could not be released to the public.
..in other words, he kept quiet all these years about all that secret dirty CIA stuff, specifically, in order to insure that he would eventually be assassinated? He hated the thought of a trial so much, that he would not do what any sober thinking insider would - reveal all secrets, thus removing any rational in being murdered?
I think your inside sourced do not know what they are talking about and probably never been "on the inside".
That's a good point. If Osama bin Laden knew some dirty secrets, he would have leaked it to Al Jazeera or some random website.
I know some really subversive and dangerous things. The best self-defense is to tell as many people as possible, reducing any incentive for someone to eliminate me.
My "dangerous secrets" are:
1. All taxation is theft.
2. Psychopaths can manipulate and control people.
3. A government monopoly is unnecessary.
The best way to fight the bad guys is to make sure as many people as possible know the truth.
That's a good point. If Osama bin Laden knew some dirty secrets, he would have leaked it to Al Jazeera or some random website.
I know some really subversive and dangerous things. The best self-defense is to tell as many people as possible, reducing any incentive for someone to eliminate me.
My "dangerous secrets" are:
1. All taxation is theft.
2. Psychopaths can manipulate and control people.
3. A government monopoly is unnecessary.
The best way to fight the bad guys is to make sure as many people as possible know the truth.
In some cases, isn't it better to have it arranged so information gets released IF you get killed? Perhaps that's why there were so many people in the compound and so many terrabites of information found on the compound? Perhaps it was aranged that information would have been released but they killed him and everyone who was supposed to release it. But I have to believe if that was really him he would have someone "off-site" with a copy of the information. Perhaps it has been released somewhere and the media is censoring it?
Post a Comment