tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post7858315323569076230..comments2023-09-24T08:04:06.909-04:00Comments on FSK's Guide to Reality: Reader Mail #74FSKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11903396202330950362noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-79176308214008962772010-08-30T00:11:04.320-04:002010-08-30T00:11:04.320-04:001. I never claimed to be an agorist. People quot...1. I never claimed to be an agorist. People quote me if they see something worthwhile in what I write.<br />2. Although I advise to try to stay out of sight of the police, I don't say "never violate regulations." I only point out that there are risks to going outside of the regulations.Ayn R. Keyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14542012608585134864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-62969648763599489382009-01-23T15:00:00.000-05:002009-01-23T15:00:00.000-05:00I second DixieFlatline's suggestion.I second DixieFlatline's suggestion.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-13291077482721659162009-01-23T14:39:00.000-05:002009-01-23T14:39:00.000-05:00FSK wrote: "I also noticed Sunni saying "FSK sucks...FSK wrote: <I>"I also noticed Sunni saying "FSK sucks!" Sunni is confusing agorism with tax evasion/resistance."</I><BR/><BR/>I wrote no such thing, nor do I think that. It's clear we have differing views of what agorism is, but that's all. And unlike you, I don't think that necessarily means I am confused, nor that only one of us can be 100% right.<BR/><BR/>FSK also wrote, regarding a comment on my site: <I>"My reaction was "ROFL!!", if that author thinks she understands agorism (and Sunni agrees with her)."</I><BR/><BR/>I did not comment in response to it, so how can you claim that I agree with her?<BR/><BR/>And last:<I>"Sunni also had an interesting comment: 'If only human society could evolve along the lines of Moore's Law. Ah yes. Y'all have a great day.'</I><BR/><BR/>My web site hosts a group blog with several contributors. That post was written by someone other than me. A strong visual clue of that (aside from the author's name) is the differing icon graphic that accompanies each entry [a legend is in the right sidebar].<BR/><BR/>FSK, I am very interested in many of the freedom-related ideas you explore here. However, I don't appreciate the gross mischaracterization of what I write, and an overall lack of accuracy in your responses to content on my site. It has called into question your representation of others' ideas for me—and that is never a good thing for a writer. It can be disastrous for a writer who wants to be taken seriously for things other than satire or pure sensationalism. As your plan as published suggests that you do want to be taken seriously, please consider this as constructive commentary rather than a personal attack.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-55919710234628252002009-01-23T13:56:00.000-05:002009-01-23T13:56:00.000-05:00I plan to blog some comments to your comments, but...I plan to blog some comments to your comments, but one deserves to be placed here.<BR/><BR/>I think your Reader Mail are your best posts. By far. Sure, you have some gems that are on specific topics, but the Reader Mail posts are a fantastic read.<BR/><BR/>That said, they are waaaaaaay too long. Sometimes I print them out (Blogger's print formatting blows) but sometimes I just have to skip large portions due to time constraints.<BR/><BR/>Just a suggestion, but shorten these up. Please. Not subtract content, but publish them more often in smaller portions.<BR/><BR/>Maybe pick a certain size that you post at, perhaps 4,000 words. By my count, this post was approx, 36,000 words.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com