tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post2614138567652933733..comments2023-09-24T08:04:06.909-04:00Comments on FSK's Guide to Reality: Aaron Swartz IndictmentFSKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11903396202330950362noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-56650189016593687522011-09-05T06:47:59.768-04:002011-09-05T06:47:59.768-04:00TOO BAD AARON DOESN'T HAVE AS MUCH $$$ AS PFIZ...TOO BAD AARON DOESN'T HAVE AS MUCH $$$ AS PFIZER. THEY GET TO PAY THEIR WAY OUT OF FELONIES. LOOK IT UP ON US DEPT OF 'JUSTICE'<br /><br />WAKE UP AMERICA !Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-63154146193780030092011-08-16T21:34:53.828-04:002011-08-16T21:34:53.828-04:00Excellent enlightening session. Thank you for thi...Excellent enlightening session. Thank you for this, I hope others read this, I'll forward on.<br /><br />BryanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2182962435875556601.post-82384877201867923112011-07-25T13:54:24.900-04:002011-07-25T13:54:24.900-04:00>PACER is a paid-by-subscription
>archive o...>PACER is a paid-by-subscription <br />>archive of US court documents.<br /><br />I don't live in the US, but in my country law is defined not only by statutory law made by Parliament but also on previous court decisions.<br /><br />The latter are difficult to look up.<br /><br />Relatively recently law was amended by Parliament. The effect of the amendment was to make previously easy to understand law into a minefield of ambiguity.<br /><br />So a bunch of aggressive organizations decided to swing the lead and sue people based on the new amendment, even thought they hadn't lost anything. They were trying to take advantage of loopholes.<br /><br />Judges made a number of decisions which effectively put limits on the amendment. Each decision would have meant than a little guy was put through hell for a year, but came out victorious.<br /><br />Unfortunately the same loopholes will be taken advantage of time and time again, because individuals can't afford to do literature searches of previous court decisions. Lawyers know that and so they will try the same scams again on behalf of their greedy clients, despite the fact case law is against them.<br /><br />It is immoral that case law in not freely and easily available.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com